At the heart of Sweden's current environmental discourse is a pivotal debate on the future of forestry, highlighting the pressing need for a sustainable shift in practices.

Critics, including Klimatriksdagen and Greenpeace, argue that the existing model, heavily reliant on clear-cutting and intensive wood production, compromises biodiversity, water quality, and climate goals.

They advocate for extended rotation periods and a move towards more natural forest management, emphasizing the ecological and societal benefits of such an approach.

This stance is juxtaposed against concerns from the forest industry about potential impacts on timber supply and job security.

The debate underscores a growing recognition of the forest's multifaceted value, beyond just timber production, encompassing its role in carbon sequestration, biodiversity, and public health.